Gmail vs Outlook in email deliverability 2025

Gmail vs. Outlook for Cold Email: Which Platform Keeps You Out of Spam in 2025?

May 16, 20255 min read

Gmail vs. Outlook for Cold Email: Which Platform Keeps You Out of Spam in 2025?

outlook vs gmail for cold email deliverability

The Cold Email Deliverability Showdown: Gmail vs. Outlook

If you're running cold email campaigns for your business, you've likely asked yourself this critical question: "Which platform will give my emails the best chance of actually reaching my prospects' inboxes?"

It's a question worth asking. After all, even the most brilliantly crafted cold email is worthless if it lands in the spam folder.

At Triple Take Marketing, we've helped countless businesses optimize their cold email strategies, and one of the most common dilemmas we see is the choice between Google Workspace (Gmail with a custom domain) and Microsoft 365 (Outlook with a custom domain).

Today, we're settling the debate with a data-driven comparison specifically focused on businesses sending moderate volumes (70-100 emails per day) using automation tools like Woodpecker.

Beyond the Sending Limits: What Really Matters

Let's start by addressing what doesn't matter much in this comparison:

Technical sending limits aren't a significant factor for most businesses sending 70-100 cold emails daily:

  • Google Workspace allows up to 2,000 emails per day

  • Microsoft 365 permits up to 10,000 recipients daily (with a rate limit of 30 messages per minute)

Both platforms offer more than enough capacity for moderate-volume campaigns. The real differences lie elsewhere.

The Common Ground: What Both Platforms Require

Before diving into the differences, it's important to understand that both Gmail and Outlook demand certain fundamentals for successful cold email delivery:

  • Meticulous account warm-up - Gradually increasing sending volume over weeks

  • Proper technical setup - SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication

  • Quality content and lists - Non-spammy messaging and verified recipient addresses

  • Engagement monitoring - Tracking opens, clicks, and replies

  • Clear unsubscribe options - Maintaining compliance and sender reputation

No platform offers shortcuts around these essentials. Neglect them, and you'll struggle with deliverability regardless of which service you choose.

The Critical Difference: Spam Filtering Behavior

Here's where things get interesting—and where the real differences between Gmail and Outlook emerge for cold emailers.

Google Workspace (Gmail with custom domain)

The Good:

  • More predictable filtering behavior when following best practices

  • Generally more forgiving of cold outreach when properly executed

  • More consistent deliverability patterns reported by users

  • Better tolerance for gradual scaling when engagement metrics remain positive

The Challenges:

  • Still requires rigorous adherence to sending best practices

  • Shared IP reputation can affect deliverability (though custom domains help)

  • Will still penalize poor content or list quality

Microsoft 365 (Outlook with custom domain)

The Good:

  • Professional platform with robust features

  • High technical sending capacity

  • Strong integration with other Microsoft products

The Challenges:

  • More aggressive and less predictable spam filtering for cold outreach

  • Higher tendency for emails to land in spam/junk folders despite following best practices

  • Reports of periodic "deliverability crises" affecting Outlook users

  • More sensitive to patterns associated with cold outreach

  • Quicker to flag domains or IPs if not managed with extreme care

Cold email deliverability for gmail out performs outlook

Real-World Performance with Automation Tools

When using cold email automation tools like Woodpecker (which help with personalization, follow-ups, and sending with human-like delays):

Google Workspace + Woodpecker: With proper warm-up and configuration, sending 70-100 emails/day is typically sustainable with good inbox placement, assuming engagement metrics remain positive.

Microsoft 365 + Woodpecker: While Woodpecker applies the same sending best practices, Microsoft's inherently stricter filtering means there's a higher risk of deliverability issues compared to Google Workspace—even with identical campaign setups and list quality.

The Verdict: Which Platform Lands in Spam Less Often?

Based on extensive research, industry discussions, and user experiences:

Google Workspace (Gmail with custom domain) generally lands in spam less often and offers more consistent deliverability for well-managed cold email outreach at volumes of 70-100 emails per day.

This assessment is supported by:

  • Fewer reports of sudden, unexplainable deliverability problems from Google Workspace users following best practices

  • More consistent positive experiences shared by users of cold email tools with Google Workspace

  • Microsoft 365's reputation for having more stringent and sometimes less transparent spam filtering

Key Success Factors (Regardless of Platform)

Whichever platform you choose, these factors remain critical:

  • Domain age and history - Newer domains require more extensive warm-up

  • Content quality - Avoid spammy language and irrelevant messaging

  • List hygiene - Prevent bounces and avoid spam traps

  • Engagement metrics - Monitor and optimize for opens and replies

  • Technical perfection - Ensure flawless authentication setup

  • Custom tracking domains - Protect your primary domain's reputation

The Bottom Line for Your Business

gmail wins the deliverability test

While neither platform guarantees 100% inbox placement for cold emails, Google Workspace emerges as the more favorable option if your primary concern is minimizing spam placement and achieving stable deliverability for cold outreach campaigns of 70-100 emails per day.

Microsoft 365, while excellent for general business email, presents a higher risk of deliverability challenges for cold outreach specifically.

That said, your mileage may vary based on your specific industry, audience, and email practices. The most successful cold email campaigns combine the right platform with meticulous execution and continuous optimization.

Need Help Maximizing Your Cold Email Deliverability?

At Triple Take Marketing, we specialize in helping businesses achieve breakthrough results with cold email campaigns—regardless of which platform you're using.

Our team can help you:

  • Set up proper authentication and technical infrastructure

  • Develop high-converting cold email sequences

  • Implement proper warm-up and scaling strategies

  • Monitor and optimize deliverability metrics

  • Troubleshoot spam issues and improve inbox placement

Don't let your carefully crafted messages get lost in spam folders. Contact Triple Take Marketing today to ensure your cold emails consistently reach their targets and drive real business results.

Aaron Whipple is the co-founder of Triple Take Marketing, where strategy meets heart. He helps businesses grow through sharp messaging, scroll-stopping creative, and campaigns that actually convert. Based in Cartersville, GA, Aaron works with local brands and high-growth companies alike, combining big-picture thinking with boots-on-the-ground execution. When he’s not crafting campaigns or building new ventures, you’ll find him chasing good coffee, better golf swings, and time with his growing family.

Aaron Whipple

Aaron Whipple is the co-founder of Triple Take Marketing, where strategy meets heart. He helps businesses grow through sharp messaging, scroll-stopping creative, and campaigns that actually convert. Based in Cartersville, GA, Aaron works with local brands and high-growth companies alike, combining big-picture thinking with boots-on-the-ground execution. When he’s not crafting campaigns or building new ventures, you’ll find him chasing good coffee, better golf swings, and time with his growing family.

LinkedIn logo icon
Instagram logo icon
Back to Blog